Skip to content

Want to stay smart? Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial today!

JournalFeed
  • LearnExpand
    • Article Summaries
    • Podcast
    • Videos
    • Daily Quiz
    • Weekly Quiz
    • Stats Handbook
    • Ask Alex
    • Resus Videos
    • Landmark eBook
    • LLSA
  • Pricing
  • EBM ToolsExpand
    • JournalFeed Appraisal
    • Ask Alex
    • Penicillin-Cephalosporin Cross-Reactivity Tool
    • Acid-Base Calculator
    • PE Workup Calculator
    • EBM Calculators
  • AboutExpand
    • Our Approach
    • FAQ
    • Groups
  • CME
Account
Login
JournalFeed
JournalFeed Logo

JournalFeed PubMetric Report

Analysis Source: PDF full text + PubMed metadata

JournalFeed PubMetric Score

13

High Confidence

PubMetric Score Breakdown

Relevance 2/2

Addresses a common ED presentation with potential to change practice.

Design & Methods 2/2

Prospective multicenter study with clear methodology.

Bias Risk 2/2

Low risk of bias due to prospective design and clear outcome definitions.

Results 2/2

Statistically significant and clinically meaningful findings.

Certainty & Consistency 1/2

First study of its kind; requires external validation.

Applicability 2/2

Easily implemented in ED settings with POCUS availability.

Transparency 2/2

Funding present; COI disclosure present.

Critical Appraisal

Study Identification

Title: Point-of-care ultrasound for risk stratification of urgent urological care in acute uncomplicated renal colic
Authors: Bertille Griveau, Mathilde Papin, Chloé Thibaud, Claire Mordant, Christophe Berranger, Emmanuel Montassier, Philippe L. E. Conte, Éric Batard, Quentin Le Bastard
Journal: CJEM
Year: 2025
DOI: 10.1007/s43678-025-01008-y
PMID: 41138020 →
Trial Registration: Not reported
Country / Region: France
Setting: Three French EDs

Background

Predicting the need for urgent urological care in ED patients with suspected renal colic is challenging, with no validated strategy available at initial presentation.

Study Question

Can a combination of POCUS findings and clinical characteristics identify patients at low risk of requiring urgent urological care?

Study Design & Conduct

Study Design: Prospective multicenter study
Prospective / Retrospective: Prospective
Multicenter: Yes
Unit of Allocation: Not applicable
Unit of Analysis: Patients
Randomization Method: Not applicable
Allocation Concealment: Not applicable
Blinding: Not applicable
Follow-up Duration: 30 days

Population

Inclusion Criteria:
  • Adult patients with suspected uncomplicated acute renal colic
  • Renal colic considered most probable diagnosis by treating physician
Exclusion Criteria:
  • Suspicion of urinary tract infection
  • Hemodynamic instability
  • Single kidney
  • Renal transplantation
  • Pregnancy
  • Age below 18 years
  • Lack of consent
Number Screened: 176
Number Enrolled: 168
Number Analyzed: 168
Key Baseline Characteristics
Age: Mean 46.1 years
Sex: 49% female
Disease Severity: Not reported
Care Setting Distribution: Emergency Department
Additional Baseline Characteristics
  • 45% with history of renal colic

Exposures / Interventions

Primary Exposure / Intervention
Description: POCUS examination
Definition / Dose: Assessment of hydronephrosis severity
Timing: Upon ED presentation
Classification Method: Performed by trained emergency physicians
Protocolized / Discretionary: Protocolized
Comparator / Reference
Description: Not applicable
Definition: Not applicable

Outcomes & Results

Primary Outcomes
Urgent urological care within 30 days
Definition: In-hospital admission, urological procedure within 24 hours after ED admission, or new ED admission within 30 days leading to urgent urological procedure within 24 hours.
Time Point: 30 days
Measurement Method: Medical record review and follow-up calls
Results: 15% required urgent urological care
Secondary Outcomes
Alternative diagnoses identified by POCUS
Definition: Rate of alternative diagnoses identified
Time Point: During ED visit
Measurement Method: POCUS examination
Results: Not reported

Risk of Bias

Risk of Bias - ROBINS-I
  • Confounding (Low): Study controlled for major confounders through multivariable analysis.
  • Selection of Participants (Low): Consecutive patients were included, reducing selection bias.
  • Classification of Interventions (Low): Interventions were clearly defined and consistently applied.
  • Deviations from Intended Interventions (Low): Interventions were protocolized and deviations were unlikely.
  • Missing Data (Low): No missing data reported for primary outcomes.
  • Measurement of Outcomes (Low): Outcomes were clearly defined and measured consistently.
  • Selection of the Reported Result (Low): All relevant outcomes were reported.
Transparency
Funding Disclosed: TRUE
COI Statement Present: TRUE

PubMetric Brief

Take-Home Message
The ECOLIC score, combining POCUS and clinical findings, helps identify low-risk renal colic patients who may not need urgent urological care.

Study Summary
This multicenter prospective study developed the ECOLIC score to predict the need for urgent urological care in patients with suspected uncomplicated acute renal colic. Conducted in three French EDs, the study included 168 patients who underwent POCUS to assess hydronephrosis. The primary outcome was urgent urological care within 30 days. Three predictors were identified: age over 65 years, moderate to severe hydronephrosis, and persistent pain 4 hours post-analgesia. The ECOLIC score (0-6) showed a score ≤ 1 had a 98% negative predictive value for urgent care. This tool could help safely discharge low-risk patients without immediate CT or urological referral, pending external validation.

Citation
Point-of-care ultrasound for risk stratification of urgent urological care in acute uncomplicated renal colic . CJEM. 2025;27(12):984-994. PMID: 41138020

Analyze another article
Login My Account Logout

Doctors in the Know Save Lives

Facebook Instagram Linkedin Youtube Envelope

©2026 JournalFeed All Rights Reserved

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
I'm Alex, Your AI Research Assistant
Ask medical questions • Get evidence-based answers
I'm Alex - How can I help?
Support mode is only for customer service and basic FAQs. Switch to Research mode for clinical questions. Choose your mode above.
Alex is analyzing...
  • Learn
    • Article Summaries
    • Podcast
    • Videos
    • Daily Quiz
    • Weekly Quiz
    • Stats Handbook
    • Ask Alex
    • Resus Videos
    • Landmark eBook
    • LLSA
  • Pricing
  • EBM Tools
    • JournalFeed Appraisal
    • Ask Alex
    • Penicillin-Cephalosporin Cross-Reactivity Tool
    • Acid-Base Calculator
    • PE Workup Calculator
    • EBM Calculators
  • About
    • Our Approach
    • FAQ
    • Groups
  • CME
Login
Account
Search