Skip to content

Want to stay smart? Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial today!

JournalFeed
  • LearnExpand
    • Article Summaries
    • Podcast
    • Videos
    • Daily Quiz
    • Weekly Quiz
    • Stats Handbook
    • Ask Alex
    • Resus Videos
    • Landmark eBook
    • LLSA
  • Pricing
  • EBM ToolsExpand
    • JournalFeed Appraisal
    • Ask Alex
    • Penicillin-Cephalosporin Cross-Reactivity Tool
    • Acid-Base Calculator
    • PE Workup Calculator
    • EBM Calculators
  • AboutExpand
    • Our Approach
    • FAQ
    • Groups
  • CME
Account
Login
JournalFeed
JournalFeed Logo

JournalFeed PubMetric Report

Analysis Source: Full text (PMC12687207) + PubMed metadata

JournalFeed PubMetric Score

13

High Confidence

PubMetric Score Breakdown

Relevance 2/2

Febrile neonates are a high-stakes, common presentation in emergency departments. A rule that can safely reduce invasive procedures (lumbar puncture) has significant clinical impact.

Design & Methods 2/2

A pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies from multiple international centers is a strong design for validating a diagnostic rule.

Bias Risk 1/2

QUADAS-2: Patient selection, index test, and reference standard domains appear to be at low risk of bias. However, the 'Flow and Timing' domain has 'some concerns' due to the abstract not explicitly detailing blinding of index test interpretation to reference standard, and vice versa, or the exact timing of all tests relative to each other, though it is implied to be well-conducted in prospective cohorts.

Results 2/2

The high sensitivity (94.2%) and negative predictive value (99.4%) for invasive bacterial infection, coupled with 0% missed bacterial meningitis cases, are clinically meaningful and statistically significant findings.

Certainty & Consistency 2/2

The pooled analysis of 4 studies from 6 countries, including a secondary analysis with original derivation cohorts, provides strong evidence and consistency across diverse populations.

Applicability 2/2

The rule utilizes readily available laboratory tests (urinalysis, procalcitonin, absolute neutrophil count) that are standard in most pediatric emergency department settings.

Transparency 2/2

Funding sources and conflicts of interest were explicitly disclosed in the article.

Critical Appraisal

Study Identification

Title: Prediction of Bacteremia and Bacterial Meningitis Among Febrile Infants Aged 28 Days or Younger
Authors: Burstein Brett, Waterfield Thomas, Umana Etimbuk, Xie Jianling, Kuppermann Nathan
Journal: JAMA
Year: 2026
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2025.21454
PMID: 41359314 →
Trial Registration: Not reported
Country / Region: 6 countries
Setting: Pediatric emergency departments

Background

Fever in the first month of life is often the only sign of life-threatening invasive bacterial infection (IBI), specifically bacteremia or bacterial meningitis. Most international guidelines recommend routine lumbar punctures for all febrile infants 28 days or younger to rule out bacterial meningitis. Clinical prediction rules may allow for select testing, but limited information exists on their performance to identify infants at low risk for invasive bacterial infections.

Study Question

How accurately does a clinical prediction rule based on urinalysis, procalcitonin, and absolute neutrophil count identify febrile young infants at low risk for bacteremia and/or bacterial meningitis?

Study Design & Conduct

Study Design: Pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies (diagnostic accuracy study)
Prospective / Retrospective: Prospective
Multicenter: Yes
Unit of Allocation: Not applicable
Unit of Analysis: Infants
Randomization Method: Not applicable
Allocation Concealment: Not applicable
Blinding: Not reported
Follow-up Duration: Not reported

Population

Inclusion Criteria:
  • Previously healthy
  • Non–ill-appearing
  • Full-term (≥37 weeks’ gestation) infants
  • Aged 28 days or younger
  • Temperature ≥38.0 °C
  • Underwent urine, blood, and serum testing
Exclusion Criteria:
Number Screened: Not reported
Number Enrolled: 1537
Number Analyzed: 1537
Key Baseline Characteristics
Age: 28 days or younger
Sex: 905 male (58.9%)
Disease Severity: Febrile (≥38.0 °C), non–ill-appearing; 4.5% had invasive bacterial infections, 0.7% had bacterial meningitis.
Care Setting Distribution: Pediatric emergency departments
Additional Baseline Characteristics
  • 1324 hospitalized (86.1%)
  • 1080 with lumbar punctures (70.3%)

Exposures / Interventions

Primary Exposure / Intervention
Description: Updated PECARN prediction rule for low risk of invasive bacterial infection.
Definition / Dose: Negative urinalysis/dipstick test result, serum procalcitonin ≤0.5 ng/mL, and blood absolute neutrophil count ≤4000/mm³.
Timing: At presentation/evaluation for fever.
Classification Method: Based on laboratory test results.
Protocolized / Discretionary: Protocolized
Comparator / Reference
Description: Diagnosis of invasive bacterial infections (bacteremia or bacterial meningitis).
Definition: Not explicitly defined in the abstract, but typically confirmed by culture for bacteremia and CSF culture for bacterial meningitis.

Outcomes & Results

Primary Outcomes
Diagnostic accuracy of the PECARN rule for invasive bacterial infections (IBI)
Definition: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value for bacteremia or bacterial meningitis.
Time Point: At presentation/diagnosis
Measurement Method: Meta-analytic methods applied to pooled data from prospective cohort studies.
Results: Sensitivity 94.2% (95% CI, 85.6%-97.8%), Specificity 41.6% (95% CI, 36.7%-46.7%), PPV 6.9% (95% CI, 4.8%-9.9%), NPV 99.4% (95% CI, 98.1%-99.8%).
Secondary Outcomes
Diagnostic accuracy for bacterial meningitis
Definition: Ability of the rule to identify infants with bacterial meningitis.
Time Point: At presentation/diagnosis
Measurement Method: Not explicitly stated, but implied to be based on the same rule application.
Results: No infants classified as being at low risk had bacterial meningitis.
Diagnostic accuracy in secondary analysis (original derivation + validation cohorts)
Definition: Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV for IBI in a larger combined cohort.
Time Point: At presentation/diagnosis
Measurement Method: Not explicitly stated, but implied to be based on the same rule application.
Results: Rule performance was similar to primary analysis. No infants with bacterial meningitis were misclassified.

Risk of Bias

Risk of Bias - QUADAS-2
  • Patient Selection (Low): The study included a well-defined, consecutive series of previously healthy, non–ill-appearing, full-term infants aged 28 days or younger with fever from pediatric emergency departments, minimizing concerns about patient selection bias.
  • Index Test (Low): The updated PECARN rule (negative urinalysis/dipstick, serum procalcitonin ≤0.5 ng/mL, and blood absolute neutrophil count ≤4000/mm³) was clearly defined and applied, reducing concerns about bias in index test execution or interpretation.
  • Reference Standard (Low): The reference standard, diagnosis of invasive bacterial infections (bacteremia or bacterial meningitis), is an appropriate and generally accepted method for confirming the target condition.
  • Flow and Timing (Some concerns): The abstract does not explicitly state whether the interpretation of the index test was performed blind to the results of the reference standard, or vice versa. While it's a pooled analysis of prospective cohorts, the lack of explicit detail on blinding and the exact timing between index test and reference standard application for all patients leads to some concerns, though it's implied that all relevant tests were performed.
Transparency
Funding Disclosed: TRUE
COI Statement Present: TRUE

PubMetric Brief

Take-Home Message
The updated PECARN rule, using urinalysis, procalcitonin, and absolute neutrophil count, had a 99.4% negative predictive value for invasive bacterial infection in febrile neonates.

Study Summary
This pooled analysis of four prospective cohort studies from six countries evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the updated Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) rule for identifying febrile infants 28 days or younger at low risk for invasive bacterial infections (IBI), defined as bacteremia or bacterial meningitis. The study included 1537 previously healthy, non–ill-appearing, full-term infants with a temperature of 38.0 °C or higher. Infants were classified as low risk if they had a negative urinalysis/dipstick, serum procalcitonin ≤0.5 ng/mL, and blood absolute neutrophil count ≤4000/mm³. Among the 1537 infants, 69 (4.5%) had IBIs, including 11 (0.7%) with bacterial meningitis. The PECARN rule classified 632 (41.1%) infants as low risk. The rule demonstrated a sensitivity of 94.2% (95% CI, 85.6%-97.8%), a specificity of 41.6% (95% CI, 36.7%-46.7%), a positive predictive value of 6.9% (95% CI, 4.8%-9.9%), and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.4% (95% CI, 98.1%-99.8%) for IBIs. Notably, no infants classified as low risk had bacterial meningitis. A secondary analysis of 2531 infants, including original derivation cohorts, showed similar performance, with no missed cases of bacterial meningitis.

Citation
Prediction of Bacteremia and Bacterial Meningitis Among Febrile Infants Aged 28 Days or Younger . JAMA. 2026;335(5):425-433. PMID: 41359314

Analyze another article
Login My Account Logout

Doctors in the Know Save Lives

Facebook Instagram Linkedin Youtube Envelope

©2026 JournalFeed All Rights Reserved

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
I'm Alex, Your AI Research Assistant
Ask medical questions • Get evidence-based answers
I'm Alex - How can I help?
Support mode is only for customer service and basic FAQs. Switch to Research mode for clinical questions. Choose your mode above.
Alex is analyzing...
  • Learn
    • Article Summaries
    • Podcast
    • Videos
    • Daily Quiz
    • Weekly Quiz
    • Stats Handbook
    • Ask Alex
    • Resus Videos
    • Landmark eBook
    • LLSA
  • Pricing
  • EBM Tools
    • JournalFeed Appraisal
    • Ask Alex
    • Penicillin-Cephalosporin Cross-Reactivity Tool
    • Acid-Base Calculator
    • PE Workup Calculator
    • EBM Calculators
  • About
    • Our Approach
    • FAQ
    • Groups
  • CME
Login
Account
Search