A Full ICU Doesn’t Change the Dispo
December 2, 2016
Short Attention Span Summary
No “soft” ICU admits
The tighter the ICU is on beds, the higher they raise the bar on admission. Authors found that 9% fewer ICU-eligible patients were initially admitted to the ICU when it was over 90% capacity. This study suggests that’s not best for patients. When patients who needed intensive care were first admitted to the ICU, this led to 32% fewer readmissions, decreased length of stay, and over 70% reduction in emergent transfers to the ICU from the floor. An ICU patient needs an ICU. Just because they are tight on beds doesn’t alter the disposition decision.
Spoon Feed
Graciously stand your ground when a patient needs ICU-level care and don’t get talked into admitting to the floor when your training tells you otherwise. That is acting in the patient’s best interest. If we can free up room in the ED for all-comers, the ICU can too.
Abstract
Crit Care Med. 2016 Oct;44(10):1814-21. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001850.
Association Among ICU Congestion, ICU Admission Decision, and Patient Outcomes.
Kim SH1, Chan CW, Olivares M, Escobar GJ.
Author information:
11Data Sciences and Operations, Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.2Decision, Risk, and Operations Division, Columbia Business School, New York, NY.3Departamento de Ingenieria Industrial, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.4Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Division of Research, Oakland, CA.5Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Department of Inpatient Pediatrics, Walnut Creek, CA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES:
To employ automated bed data to examine whether ICU occupancy influences ICU admission decisions and patient outcomes.
DESIGN:
Retrospective study using an instrumental variable to remove biases from unobserved differences in illness severity for patients admitted to ICU.
SETTING:
Fifteen hospitals in an integrated healthcare delivery system in California.
PATIENTS:
Seventy thousand one hundred thirty-three episodes involving patients admitted via emergency departments to a medical service over a 1-year period between 2008 and 2009.
INTERVENTIONS:
None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:
A third of patients admitted via emergency department to a medical service were admitted under high ICU congestion (more than 90% of beds occupied). High ICU congestion was associated with a 9% lower likelihood of ICU admission for patients defined as eligible for ICU admission. We further found strong associations between ICU admission and patient outcomes, with a 32% lower likelihood of hospital readmission if the first inpatient unit was an ICU. Similarly, hospital length of stay decreased by 33% and likelihood of transfer to ICU from other units-including ICU readmission if the first unit was an ICU-decreased by 73%.
CONCLUSIONS:
High ICU congestion is associated with a lower likelihood of ICU admission, which has important operational implications and can affect patient outcomes. By taking advantage of our ability to identify a subset of patients whose ICU admission decisions are affected by congestion, we found that, if congestion were not a barrier and more eligible patients were admitted to ICU, this hospital system could save approximately 7.5 hospital readmissions and 253.8 hospital days per year. These findings could help inform future capacity planning and staffing decisions.
PMID: 27332046 [PubMed – in process]