BlogNew AHA Syncope Guidelines – Spoon Feed

New AHA Syncope Guidelines – Spoon Feed

2 Comments

  1. I wonder about the use of orthostatic vital signs as a diagnostic in syncope. My concern is that a large percentage of individuals, especially elderly, may infact have "orthostatic positive" vital signs and that there may be early closure on dehydration or hypovolemia instead of a more nefarious cause. Is there literature that shows that obtaining positional blood pressure in syncope has clinically significant outcomes over, say, just physical exam alone, or just standing the patient up and seeing if they get symptoms?

    1. Hey Max! After reading the AHA guidelines and the 2015 Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus (reference 24), I believe that orthostatic tests should be seen as the "poor man’s tilt table test." It seems that maybe the most efficient way to get the most out of this test is to skip the sitting phase and go straight to the standing. Check HR and BP on standing and then after 3 minutes to get a sense of delayed OH. If there is still high suspicion for POTS or other neurogenic causes, tilt table testing is superior.

      The AHA guidelines separate out orthostatic intolerance (symptoms with standing) from orthostatic hypotension. OI may occur with or without orthostatic tachycardia, OH, or syncope. Actually measuring the vital signs is helpful diagnostically. For example, an increase in heart rate is seen in POTS whereas vasovagal syncope usually has associated bradycardia.

      Your concern about premature closure is fair. Many consultants may push you to avoid admission based on orthostatics alone. But if you look carefully at the guidelines, nothing in the AHA document encourages you to avoid an admission based on orthostatic testing. Intermediate or high risk patients as described in the guidelines deserve a thorough workup before focusing exclusively on the abnormal orthostatic vitals.

Leave a Reply