Short Attention Span Summary
We need help with our drug problem
This was a single-center study in Spain. They found having a pharmacist in the ED helped catch multiple medication errors, the majority of them potentially severe and clinically relevant.
Spoon Feed
PharmDs in the ED are a good thing. We like ours!
Abstract
Emerg Med J. 2016 Dec 5. pii: emermed-2015-204726. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2015-204726. [Epub ahead of print]
Clinical relevance of pharmacist intervention in an emergency department.
Pérez-Moreno MA1, Rodríguez-Camacho JM2, Calderón-Hernanz B2, Comas-Díaz B3, Tarradas-Torras J4.
Author information:
1Pharmacy Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville. Spain.
2Pharmacy Department, Hospital Son Llàtzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
3Emergency Department, Hospital Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
4Emergency Department, Hospital Son Llàtzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES:
To evaluate the clinical relevance of pharmacist intervention on patient care in emergencies, to determine the severity of detected errors. Second, to analyse the most frequent types of interventions and type of drugs involved and to evaluate the clinical pharmacist’s activity.
METHODS:
A 6-month observational prospective study of pharmacist intervention in the Emergency Department (ED) at a 400-bed hospital in Spain was performed to record interventions carried out by the clinical pharmacists. We determined whether the intervention occurred in the process of medication reconciliation or another activity, and whether the drug involved belonged to the High-Alert Medications Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) list. To evaluate the severity of the errors detected and clinical relevance of the pharmacist intervention, a modified assessment scale of Overhage and Lukes was used. Relationship between clinical relevance of pharmacist intervention and the severity of medication errors was assessed using ORs and Spearman’s correlation coefficient.
RESULTS:
During the observation period, pharmacists reviewed the pharmacotherapy history and medication orders of 2984 patients. A total of 991 interventions were recorded in 557 patients; 67.2% of the errors were detected during medication reconciliation. Medication errors were considered severe in 57.2% of cases and 64.9% of pharmacist intervention were considered relevant. About 10.9% of the drugs involved are in the High-Alert Medications ISMP list. The severity of the medication error and the clinical significance of the pharmacist intervention were correlated (Spearman’s ρ=0.728/p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS:
In this single centre study, the clinical pharmacists identified and intervened on a high number of severe medication errors. This suggests that emergency services will benefit from pharmacist-provided drug therapy services.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
PMID: 27920036 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]
